Question: Should employee and supervisor be required to meet after both Bi-Annual evaluation narratives are submitted by the APA member to the Administrative Area Supervisor (November and April)?
Answer: The intention of the new evaluation process is to promote communication between employees and supervisors. Ideally, after the first bi-annual report is submitted there would be some kind of acknowledgement of the report. If there is any dispute about the content of the first narrative – a broader follow-up discussion should be conducted. It is required that a meeting be held after both narratives have been completed in April – and prior to the full evaluation package being submitted to HR for the employee record in June.